Stop Graham Hancock From Destroying The Universe!

I am here to implore you for help in stopping the greatest threat the Universe has ever known!  
The most diabolical Graham Hancock!
Now I know that in a previous post I've said that Graham has actually been quite nice and appreciative of me and the small bit of work I've done on his site.
Well, I was wrong.  Clearly Graham was only being pseudo-nice.  In fact this bloke is pseudo everything! 
Just ask @kuHoopes or @FlintDibble.  I would myself, but it seems like they very accidentally blocked me on Twitter.  Just when the world, nay the universe needs heroes to gather up the armies of straw men and lazy smears to defeat this nefarious Hancock.
What makes Hancock so dangerous you may ask?  
Well, you may want to have a seat, but during his pseudo-time as a pseudo-journalist while working in Ethiopia , which at the time was a conflict zone. (but alas, if Hancock is involved we can only rightfully assume it was a pseudo-conflict), Hancock had some experiences that made him question what is normally understood about history.  This was before Fingerprints of the Gods or America before or any of his other terrible best selling books.  This was the start of Hancock becoming dangerous to all of reality.
He had an idea.  An idea he wasn't supposed to have. Then he followed that idea, an idea that he should not have followed. 
He said "Hmm, there seems to be a few gaps, a few mysteries even."  
And then, 'apparently' acting as a journalist he went and talked to different people in various fields to see how plausible his ideas might be. 
The only problem, is that while he talked to people in various fields, such as Geologists, he also talked with people who had ideas about the past and how long ago things happened.  People with ideas.  Worse than that, Hancock started having ideas that looked a lot like Archeology.  Some might argue that he is simply acting as a journalist and sometimes reporting on his perspective on Archeological things, but you would be wrong!  Only Archeologists can have ideas or opinions on Archeological things. Not you, not some loopy Archeologist out there who might have sympathy for this nonsense, and certainly NOT Hancock. The fact that people read and enjoy his books all over the world is proof that the dude is up to no good.  It doesn't even matter that Hancock never says his views are absolute fact. That other people might ponder the same things he does, the fact they too might have IDEAS make him a threat to all existence.  He has become a pseudo-archeologist, which pretty much makes him a pseudo-everything, his own pseudo-universe!! 

I think you can well imagine what happens when the pseudo-universe comes into contact with the universe you are allowed to think about, because speculation and exploration of ideas is just the root of all evil.

So, you say we should debate him?  No, of course not.  Why bother when we can tar him with  calling him pseudo whatever and conflate him with anything lamentable that uses the same alphabet as him.  
In fact, we have already debated him in our heads and decided he lost, because he said things we didn't like. Not even just disagree with. Like some kind of hatred. 
So gather up defender of our ideas and not yours.  Stay tuned for my next post when I detail how Graham Hancock's ideas started the great fire of London. 

I am of course, only being Pseudo-serious about all of this.  

Imagine if he could disagree and debate on ideas but be respectful of each other as people? 

---